Subject: Re: SW chocolate vs. ST butterscotch Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 11:20:13 +0200 From: "Bas-Jan Walewijk" K. Howe wrote: >On 1 Jul 1997, DBald56576 wrote: >> If I was saying SW sensors are better (which they >> absolutely are NOT), you'd all be applauding me. >people complained because they didn't want *another* ST vs. SW thread >here, not because st has better sensors (in *your* opinion, i might add) >if you read the posts, that's what they would say! did anyone argue for >Star Wars? no? then maybe those of us here are just not interested in >arguing about it (at least, not at this time). get a clue. So true. It's like this: [two people meet on the street] A: Hey, what's that you're having? B: It's a chocolate bar. A: Chocolate? Oh, yeah, that's OK. But butterscotch rules. B: Whatever. A: So, shall I tell you why butterscotch is better? I mean, it's more nutritious, it's less fattening and it's non-addictive. In fact, it completely blows chocolate out of the water. B: OK, sure, but I like my chocolate. So, if you'll excuse me... A: So you do, do you? Fine. Let's discuss what *else* is wrong with chocolate. B: Really, I'd rather not. Besides, you're a strange little man and I don't know where you've been. Leave me alone. A: Well, I'm just trying to stir up some discussion with *you*, pal, just like I did with your loser chocolate-scrounging friends who dropped by at the Guns and Butterscotch Association. They told me it wasn't fair I was picking on them - and sure, they had a point, they were in the minority there - so I went out on the street to find some chocolate junkie who was willing to have an intelligent debate. B: Let me know if you find one. Bye. A: Oh, right - crybaby. Can't face my arguments, can you, huh? All your whining, just because you can't back it up, you just *can't* back that up, can you? Bet you wouldn't be acting all snotty like that if I'd said chocolate was better, huh? Nooo, then you'd have said: "Let's find some butterscotch guys to beat up." Lamer. Coward. [exeunt] __________________________________________________________________________________ Subject: Re: SW chocolate vs. ST butterscotch Date: Wed, 02 Jul 1997 18:51:09 GMT From: oblio@death-star.com (oblio-1 ) Aeons ago, on the memorable date of Wed, 2 Jul 1997 11:20:13 +0200, Bas-Jan Walewijk wrote to all: >A: Hey, what's that you're having? >B: It's a chocolate bar. >A: Chocolate? Oh, yeah, that's OK. But butterscotch rules. >B: Whatever. a: yeah, and one of the nuts in the chocolate bar is gay. b: well, at least the foil wrapper would withstand anything your butterscotch could dish out. a: so, i can eat butterscotch at warp 10. besides, your foil wrapper sucks. it can't even keep the sun from melting the chocolate. b: at least chocolate is a eatin mans kandy bar a: at least i'm not eating my mommy's candy bar. and you spell like a 3 yearold c: i've seen a nut in the chocolate bar naked a&b: you're gay. get a life. who are you to butt in out conversation - dumbass. d: well you all suck. i like both chocolate and butterscotch e: i like caramel. the flavor is more realistic than chocolate or butterscotch. besides, kraft made the wrapper f: for sale: limited edition chocolate bars a,b,c,d&e: take your spam to the peanut group _________________________________________________________________________________